Tag Archives: wine fraud

Winebits 545: Alcoholism, Big Weed, wine fraud

alcoholismThis week’s wine news: Alcoholism in the restaurant business, plus Big Wine wants to move into weed and more Chinese booze fraud

Staying sober: Nation’s Restaurant News looks at subject rarely discussed – what it calls “the culture of alcoholism and substance abuse in the restaurant business. “ In this part of the on-going series, Bret Thorne talks to a prominent Atlanta-area chef who had a choice at age 30 – stop drinking or die. “The whole lifestyle — you’re in a place that has alcohol. There’s always alcohol in the kitchen, behind the bar, and after the adrenaline of an awesome service, it was typically followed by chasing that buzz with alcohol, and then usually cocaine.”

If it’s good enough for wine: Marijuana Business Daily (and no, I’m not making that up) reports that North America’s largest wine distributor will become the the exclusive product distributor for one of Canada’s largest licensed cannabis producers. Great North Distributors, a wholly owned Canadian subsidiary of U.S.-based Southern Glazer’s, will serve as exclusive representative for Aphria’s adult-use cannabis products in Canada. This is yet another foray by U.S. wine-related companies into Canada’s legal weed business, including Big Wine stalwart Constellation Brands..

$15.6 million worth of fakes: Chinese police arrested 15 people suspected of producing more than 55,000 counterfeit bottles of high-end booze, says Reuters. Police in the southern province of Fujian broke up three gangs running workshops that made fake bottles of several famous brands of baijiu, a fiery Chinese spirit. The gangs bought cheap liquor for about 10 yuan (about US$1.56) a bottle and pour it into the counterfeit bottles, which they would sell for up to 400 yuan (about US$62) each. To give you an idea about what they were doing, this is not unlike filling empty bottles of pricey white Burgundy with Two-buck Chuck chardonnay.

Winebits 534: Wine and teeth, wine fraud, wine labels

winne and teethThis week’s wine news: What does wine do to your teeth? Plus, another massive French wine fraud and an essay calling wine labels “little white lies”

Brush up: It’s the enamel – the thin covering on your teeth – that is most affected by wine, reports the Wine Spectator in a surprisingly well-done piece discussing the dreaded purple grin. And while red wine does tend to stain teeth more than white, both can cause the enamel to decay thanks to the acid that’s present in all wine. Interestingly, while white wine doesn’t stain teeth the way red does, it can make teeth more susceptible to stains. That’s because it has more acid, which breaks down the enamel more quickly. That leaves the teeth more open to thinks like coffee stains.

Not the real thing: More than 5 ½ million cases of French wine were sold as high quality Côtes-du-Rhône label in one of the biggest French wine scandals in years. Some of the wine was even sold as high-end Chateauneuf-du-Pape, which can cost as much as $70 a bottle. French officials saids that the 2017 involved a major wine producer, which they did not name. However, the company;s top official was indicted for deception and fraud.

Wine lies: “If you think that wine labels don’t matter, that they don’t affect the way a wine tastes, think again,” writes Felix Salmon on Vinepair. This short essay discusses the label’s “little white lies” – how labels are used to convince us that the wine we drink is consistent from vintage to vintage, even if it isn’t; to alter our perception with a cute label or fancy paper. It’s an intriguing piece, though I’m not sure Salmon needed to use the word semiotic.

Winebits 508: Wine fraud edition

wine fraudThis week’s wine news: Three cases of wine fraud from around the world, because $10 wine, apparently, isn’t enough for everyone

Beware trophy wines: A big-time bond trader has accused a big-time Napa Valley retailer of selling him fake wine, and he wants $1 million from the retailer. The Wine Spectator (who else?) has all the juicy details, which include claims of criminal fraud, some top names in the history of Napa wine, and famous wines that are so rare that only a handful of people in the world get to see them these days. This is one of those times when it pays to drink Bogle; I don’t have to worry about anyone selling me a fake bottle.

“Lavish wine trips”: How did three Dallas bankers allegedly indulge in the California wine lifestyle? Federal prosecutors say the trio stole $1.2 million; the money was spent on first-class airfare, luxury hotel rooms, expensive wine and restaurant dinners, and private wine tours in Sonoma and Santa Barbara. The Wine Curmudgeon has noted before that wine is not worth corruption charges; again, there’s so much nice wine that is affordable that there’s little reason to steal to buy more expensive wine.

Even the English: A local church official stole more than £35,000 (almost US$50,000) from the restoration fund for a 12th century English church, and he used some of the stolen money to buy 76 bottles of wine for a what was apparently one of the greatest lunches of all time. The Telegraph in London reports that the man “used his trusted position to siphon off … restoration funds to bankroll a luxury lifestyle.” The story does not detail the wine served at lunch, but anyone who would steal money from a church fund probably spent more than Prosecco from Lidl.

Winebits 484: Boxed wine, wine crime, wine foolishness

boxed wineThis week’s wine news: Sound advice about boxed wine, more wine crime, and why people who don’t understand wine shouldn’t write about it

Bring on the box: Americans, for whatever reason, still don’t think much about boxed wine. Thls post, from the Lifehacker site, explains why that’s not a very progressive attitude. “… while boxed wines have long been associated with poor quality, they’re just like traditional cork and bottled wines—there are good ones and there are bad ones.” Which, of course, is true for wine no matter what it comes in and no matter what it costs. Lifehacker comes in for a lot of criticism on the blog for its wine posts, but this is not one of those posts. Yes, there is a bizarre reference to the wine and arsenic scare as well as the implication that Two-buck Chuck comes in boxes, but the boxed wines it recommends are mostly worth buying and the advice is spot on.

A wine scam: One day I need to write a post about wine crime, and why so many people are taken in by grifters who have a smooth line of wine patter. As, for example, the various English men and women who gave a long-time villain £104,000 (about US$129,000) to pay for fake wine packages. The criminal posed as a multi-millionaire wine dealer named Lars Petraeus, fleecing his victims, including what the story describes as a prominent food blogger.

No, no no: As noted in the item above, people who don’t write much about wine too often don’t do a very good job of it. Case in point is this line, from a website called Digital Trends that is shilling for a wine purifier: The gadget helps in “removing sulfites and restoring its natural taste.” Which is patently untrue, since sulfites occur naturally in wine and are part of its natural taste, whatever that is. Or how about this one? “Sulfites tend to give wine an unpleasantly bitter taste,” which also seems odd, since tannins (as well as bad grapes and bad winemaking) give wine a bitter taste. My guess is that the writer cut and pasted the news release for the gizmo, accepting as gospel whatever the release said. Which is bad form, regardless of whether you are writing about wine or politics or whatever.

Winebits 471: The not quite New Year’s edition

fake boozeThis week’s wine news: More Chinese fake booze, plus soaring Napa land prices and good news for ice wine drinkers

Fake booze: The Chinese just can’t seem to get a break when it comes to alcohol fraud. This time, reports thedrinksbusiness.com. Police in two provinces broke up counterfeiting rings earlier this year, one specializing in the fabled Chinese spirit baijiu, while the other filled empty bottles with cheap bulk wines and sold them as big name wines costing as much as RMB 3,000 (about US$431). The magazine says the fake wine had “convincing labels and caps.” Note to Chinese wine drinkers (as well those in the U.S. who buy this stuff): I write about wine, and I can’t get most of the wines they’re selling you. What does that say about the wines’ provenance?

Real estate boom: Want to buy an acre of prime vineyard land in California’s Napa Valley? Then be prepared to pony up as much as $5 million, reports Lew Perdue at Wine Industry Insight. The chart that details these prices is as depressing as it is fascinating – even some Sonoma vineyard land is approaching Napa prices, something that has never really happened before. In other words, as land prices rise, more and more of the best California wine will be priced out of the reach of most wine consumers, and could even pressure prices upward for the wine we can afford to drink.

Ice wine: Warm winters in the U.S., Canada, and Europe over the past decade have drastically cut the quality and quantity of ice wine, which is so sweet and amazing that it can be worth what it costs – $60 or more for a half bottle. The good news is that it has been cold enough in Michigan this year so that a couple of wineries will make ice wine this vintage, what one winemaker calls a rarity that always sells out. One of the great moments in my teaching career came when I let a Cordon Bleu class taste ice wine; they loved me forever.

Winebits 464: Big Wine, wine fraud, Big Weed

Big wineThis week’s wine news: Big Wine goes after women, phony French wine, and legal marijuana elections

Really big: Anyone who doubts Big Wine’s power should read this story from Bloomberg News: Treasury Wine Estates will remarket an all but unknown wine brand and target women drinkers aged 30 to 40. In addition, the Treasury executive who came up with the idea previously worked for Kraft and Coke, where marketing like this is common. And finally, the company expects the brand to be sold around the world in 18 months. Frankly, when I saw this, I was stunned: It’s just so CPG – something Proctor & Gamble would do with one of its products. But then I reminded myself that I’ve been writing for almost a decade about how Big Wine was pushing the wine business in this direction. Think they’ll send me a sample to review?

` • Phony wine: How seriously do the French take wine fraud? A Bordeaux producer will spend two years in jail for selling entry level wine as more expensive Bordeaux to French grocery stores and pay a €7.8 million fine (about US$8.6 million). Eight people were fined or received suspended sentences for their roles in the fraud, including three winemakers who did the blending and the driver who drove the delivery truck. The producer said he will appeal, saying he was shocked at the severity of the sentence. What did he expect?

Legal weed: The wine business is anxiously watching today’s election results, where nine states hold marijuana elections. That’s because wine officials see dope as a direct challenge to their business, based on its amazing success in Colorado – where taxes from grass sales have passed taxes from wine sales in some parts of the state. California, Arizona, Nevada, Massachusetts and Maine, which already allow medical use, could join Oregon, Colorado, Washington and Alaska as states that also permit recreational use. Those nine states account for nearly a quarter of the U.S. population. Can the three-tier system be far behind?

Winebits 437: Wine fraud edition

wine fraudUsually, wine fraud revolves hugely expensive bottles most of us have never heard of, can’t afford, and will never drink. This week, though, wine fraud hits wines that many of us could drink.

• Wine competition fakes: Those of us who judge wine competitions have always suspected this happened, and it turns out we weren’t far off. The intrepid W. Blake Gray reports that the prestigious Concours Mondial de Bruxelles has two accused two producers of entering a better quality wine in a lesser quality bottle in last year’s competition. Each wine won medals; hence the fraud, since what the the judges tasted wasn’t what was submitted. Said the contest director: “It was really clear that it was not the same wine. It was completely different. The samples in the competition were much different than the samples in the supermarket.” The idea here is not to counterfeit poorly made wine, but to fool everyone and get a medal by substituting better made wine for the plonk.

• Not very Kosher: How about bootlegging Kosher wine at a Montreal synagogue? Police seized 650 cases of Kosher wine at the site, which was being sold to Jews for Passover in violation of the province’s liquor laws. The laws, similar to those in Pennsylvania, require that most wine be sold through stores run by the province, the SAQ stores. But since the stores carry little Kosher wine, it’s not uncommon for Jews to being wine into the province illegally and re-sell it during Jewish holidays. The Quebec liquor cops will have none of that; in 2010, another synagogue in Montreal was charged with illegally bringing in about 1,000 bottles of Kosher wine.

• Bait and switch: A class-action lawsuit claims chain retailer BevMo tricks consumers by using scores for wine in its stores that aren’t the same vintage as the wine being sold. That is, a sign in the store might say the wine got 92 points, even though the score was for a 2014 wine and the sign was being used to sell the 2015 vintage. The BevMo response is classic: It says displays a disclaimer regarding “vintage substitution:” “We always recommend customers check the bottle for vintage if they’re looking for a certain vintage.” Which, to the cynical among us, means the score listed is irrelevant, and implies that it is a trick.