Falesco wins cheap wine poll

wine-bottles-rowFalesco Vitiano, the long-time Wine Curmudgeon favorite, stormed past Bogle over the weekend to win the blog’s first best cheap wine brand poll. Bogle had held a comfortable lead until Saturday morning, when Falesco made its move. The complete results are here.

McManis finished third, while Two-buck Chuck came in last among the 10 brands. The other big mover was Barefoot, which spent most of the poll in ninth, but rallied over the weekend to finish sixth.

The biggest surprise was Yellow + Blue, which came in ninth. I’ve never had a badly made Yellow + Blue wine, and its products regularly make the $10 Hall of Fame. The only thing I can think of is that voters really don’t like wine in boxes, which is something they need to work on.

Thanks to everyone for the terrific response, which earned the poll a Statesman’s badge from Ranker, the company that does the polling widget. We had 770 votes, which was a nice turnout for something that didn’t get a lot of planning or preparation. And thanks for all your comments, even the not-so-nice ones. Much of the what I did this year was limited by the polling widget, and I’ll see if I can streamline the polling next year.

3 thoughts on “Falesco wins cheap wine poll

  • By Elizabeth -

    I didn’t vote on Yellow + Blue because I’ve never had it, but my first assumption on the vote total would be that the people who voted don’t like the wine, rather than the container.

    • By Jeff Siegel -

      The ballot format, with the thumbs up and thumbs down, allowed people to vote against a brand. That Y+B got the third most negative votes doesn’t speak to the quality of the wine.

      • By Elizabeth -

        I agree that “liking” and “not liking” are not the same thing as high/low quality. I just didn’t think you could extrapolate a thumbs-down as a vote on the container rather than the wine.

Comments are closed.