Because, for whatever reason, the Wine Curmudgeon can’t stop writing about the world’s grape supply and how that will affect wine prices:
• The wine grape bubble: That’s the take from Lew Perdue at Wine Industry Insight, who has seen more than a few crop forecasts in his time. “…[W]e don’t know where the grape market is headed because the California wine industry operates on pretty poor advice and a lack of full, complete and unbiased facts.” He compares the hysteria around this year’s news to previous shortages that weren’t necessarily shortages, and finds several similarities. Also, he throws in a good anecdote about the late 1990s Internet bubble.
• Australia’s never ending grape supply: Remember how the Aussies were working out their grape problems? Not necessarily. “The report by the Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences predicts 5 per cent more grapes will be produced next season and another slight increase in the following vintage.” Which, given that many Australian wineries are selling grapes below cost, and others are going out of business because of low prices, is not the news its industry wants to hear.
• Lakes of European wine: Or so says a report from something called the Independent Investor, which is taking a contrarian position about investing in wine. Like, “Don’t.” It notes the difference between the fine wine market and its hype, as well as putting overall worldwide wine production in perspective: “The wine lake refers to the continuing supply surplus of wine (supply glut) produced in the European Union. A major contributor to that glut is the Languedoc-Roussillon, which produces over one-third of the grapes grown in France.”



The most important point is that it might be real this time. But too many of the same people have cried "wolf!" too many times in the past for their warnings to be credible. Growers -- and especially their organizations -- need to pony up for their own credible data on which to make independent decisions .
Posted by: Lewis Perdue | May 29, 2012 at 09:19 AM
Not sure Australia pulled 100,000 acres of grapes as did growers in CA SJ Valley did over over the last years, nor run non bearing statewide acreage below natural vine attrition rates of 3-5% for the last 10 years while existing vineyards are now aging as well, nor have virtually no nursery in CA capable of supplying planting materials due to no orders for last 10 years, nor have at least 4 major tree fruit and nut crops now considerably more profitable than wine grapes (opposite of the 90's, nor wineries like Gallo scrambling to contract 10,000 additional acres of CA grapes just to make demand.
I guess with CA producing 70% of US wine the glut will be carried on the backs of the other 49 states that make up the other 30%.
Of course I am just a grower, so how would I know
Posted by: Roger King | May 29, 2012 at 02:37 PM
This is the first that I have read about this. Interestingly in Indiana we have a lot of non-grape wines at our wineries (blackberry, cherry, etc). I wonder if they will start pushing even more of those?
Posted by: Tricia Meyer | May 30, 2012 at 11:55 AM