Food & Wine magazine is a well-done and professional book that has hundreds of thousands of readers. The Wine Curmudgeon likes Food & Wine. For one thing, it occasionally acknowledges regional wine, and its wine stuff is mostly written in English. Compared to the rest of the Wine Magazine universe, that’s top of the class.
But what Food & Wine doesn’t understand is the same thing that all of the rest of them don’t understand. Cheap wine does not cost $20. Cheap wine costs $10 or $8 or even $5. The average price of a bottle of wine in the U.S. (all together now, regular readers) is $6.
But Food & Wine, apparently, has the same blind spot that the rest of the wine world has. The winner of the “value” pinot noir (Manhattan magazines hate to use the word cheap) in its American Wine Awards, which will be announced in the October magazine, cost $20. Yes, $20 – or three times the average price of a bottle of wine.
Or, to quote the magazine: “This entry-level bottling. …”
Entry-level bottling? For Donald Trump, maybe. Why this matters, and that it’s not just another excuse for a Wine Curmudgeon rant -- after the jump:
Again, this is not about Food & Wine. It’s not even about the Siduri pinot noir that won the “value” pinot category. Siduri makes nice wine – pricey, $50 wine, but quality stuff (which, it should also be noted, is made in very small amounts and has limited distribution). Though, to its credit, Siduri doesn’t try to kid anyone: It calls its wines “ultra-premium.”
What this is about is that Americans will never accept wine as something to drink with dinner, the way we accept beer and iced tea and soft drinks, when we think that we have to spend $20 for a decent wine to have with dinner. I’ll let the wine business in on a secret: Tell an American that they can drink water for free or wine for $20 with their pork chops or meatloaf or takeout roast chicken, and most of them will drink water.
Do the math: seven times $20 is $140 a week for wine, which turns into $500 a month, which translates into two car payments. (Or one really nice car payment, I have been told.) No wonder we choose water.
This is an attitude that doesn’t exist anywhere else in the world, where they drink cheap wine every day and think nothing of it. But not here. No, we have to consult scores and wade through winespeak and have someone, with a straight face, tell us that $20 wine is an entry-level wine. Are they that out of touch with the real world?
What’s worse is that this is happening in the midst of the worst wine slump in an at least a decade, when Americans are abandoning wine that costs more than $15 so quickly that the industry has no idea what to do about it.
So give an award for the best $20 pinot in the U.S. Give as many awards as you want. But please, please don’t call them awards for cheap wine. You’re giving cheap wine a bad name.



Hey Jeff. I don't disagree that publications like Food & Wine tend to hold a different opinion on what constitutes "value" wine than the average consumer. I would argue, however, that the average consumer does not read Food & Wine. The readers of this publication on average are 45 years old college graduates, with a median household income of over $83,000 per year.
Food & Wine is just writing to its audience.
Posted by: Michael Wangbickler | September 10, 2009 at 06:08 PM
Yes, Mike, I know there is some of that. But here is an interesting conundrum. My blog demographics (according to Quantcast), are more or less the same as Food & Wine's: 45 percent aged 35-49 and 40 percent aged 50+; 31 percent $61-100,000 and 33 percent $100,000+; and 53 percent college and 24 percent grad school. Though I'm guessing Food & Wine has more women than I do (I'm 50-50 men and women) and I would like to be younger.
So how does that make sense? I'm reasonably successful writing about the exact opposite of Food & Wine, but we have the same audience. Could it be that "writing to its audience" is not what Food & Wine should be doing?
Posted by: Jeff Siegel | September 11, 2009 at 07:36 AM
Jeff,
Just to be completely correct....over half the wine we (Siduri) produce is priced at $30 or less....so to say that we produce $50 Pinot, while technically true, is only part (and less than half) of the story.
Adam Lee
Siduri Wines
Posted by: Adam Lee | September 16, 2009 at 08:23 AM