Gadgets

  • Web Analytics
  • wine Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory

« Special International Lone Star Wine Competition award | Main | Winebits 81: Aussie Two Buck Chuck, analysts and the recession, LocalWineEvents.com »

June 08, 2009

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e54f84c99f883301156fdac7fd970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Update: Costco's 90-point wines:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

There is a fine line between company policy and buyer orientation. I can't speak to the efficacy of the vendor reports you are getting, but if you take a walk through your local Costco wine section, it's clear that there is a significant reliance on ratings to sell wine in the Costco low touch sales environment. I don't see too much problem with that. Doesn't every retailer want inventory that has 90+ point turbo power behind it?

A more difficult outcome for me to reconcile is selling current vintages with past vintage ratings, even when they are indicated as past vintages, which is really common in all Costcos. So in their low sales touch environment, they ought to have a warning sign that reads "past performance is not an indicator of future performance"....whether or not it is company policy or informal operating code to push wines that score(d) 90 points.

I've never said that Costco couldn't do what it wanted to do. This is the United States, and the company can do whatever it wants. My point has always been that there is a better policy than this.

I'm curious. Why do you taker Costco's statement at face value, yet have doubts about the people I quote?

Jeff,

I don't dismiss the validity of your quotes and sources nor do I absolutely trust the email statements you published from Costco (note my recent post http://winezag.wordpress.com/2009/06/09/90-points-of-costco-wine/).

I do think it is possible that the company could maintain a buying posture that is fully discussed internally and never claim it as policy. It's semantics, but it happens all the time in companies defending necessary buy unpopular operating strategies.

Costco is a giant financial and consumer machine focused on driving equity value. And as you never claimed that they should not do what they want to or need to do, they will do whatever is necessary to maximize the square footage of retail space they are invested in.

I think your point was really that they ought to admit and be open about their policy so it can be critiqued for its merits and problems alike. Do I have that right?

Thank you, Adam. That, as the experts say, is a cogent analysis: "critiqued for its merits and problems alike." I couldn't have put it better myself.

Costco, and Alvarez-Peters in particular, are hugely influential. One of the vendors I talked to for this post (and who was the sixth who told me that he was told 90-point wines only) said that Alvarez-Peters has been called the second most powerful person in the U.S. wine business, behind only Robert Parker.

So what Costco does influences what other retailers do, and I think that this kind of reliance on scores -- if it exists -- doesn't help wine in the long run. It helps Costco during the recession, but if the idea is to educate consumers about wine, it's short-sighted. But, as you note, it isn't Costco's job to educate consumers about wine. It's to sell lots of wine.

Nice follow-up, Jeff. Moving forward, this specific incident may fade, but the issue of how the retail level of the wine trade uses and abuses ratings will continue. And that is a good thing, as it will raise awareness about just how people can better find wines they will like.

Ranting on the same story, with links to your site, I found it odd that Wine Spectator editor Tom Matthews would get fired up enough about the subject to post a comment on my site.

http://www.examiner.com/x-11305-Kansas-City-Wine-Examiner~y2009m6d11-Wines-at-Costco-Going-for-the-big-scores

Hard to believe, Dennis. Thanks for the link to my item.

how about just ignoring this whole ridiculous point business. Does anyone force you with a pistol to buy a 90+ wine?
Ed

The issue is not that I'm forced to use scores to buy wine. The issue is that too many people -- most people -- think that's how they're supposed to buy wine. All we're trying to do is to educate them to taste the wine and trust their palate, and not someone else's.

Agreed. Reviews may be used as a point of reference but shouldn't be the sole determinant. These are subject to perspective which may be similar or different to yours.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Kickstarter

2012